Quantifying Intracranial Aneurysm Wall Permeability for Risk Assessment Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: A Pilot Study

46Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pathological changes in the intracranial aneurysm wall may lead to increases in its permeability; however the clinical significance of such changes has not been explored. The purpose of this pilot study was to quantify intracranial aneurysm wall permeability (Ktrans, VL) to contrast agent as a measure of aneurysm rupture risk and compare these parameters against other established measures of rupture risk. We hypothesized Ktrans would be associated with intracranial aneurysm rupture risk as defined by various anatomic, imaging, and clinical risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven unruptured intracranial aneurysms in 23 patients were imaged with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, and wall permeability parameters (Ktrans, VL) were measured in regions adjacent to the aneurysm wall and along the paired control MCA by 2 blinded observers. Ktrans and VL were evaluated as markers of rupture risk by comparing them against established clinical (symptomatic lesions) and anatomic (size, location, morphology, multiplicity) risk metrics. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was strong as shown in regression analysis (R2 > 0.84) and intraclass correlation (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.92), indicating that the Ktrans can be reliably assessed clinically. All intracranial aneurysms had a pronounced increase in wall permeability compared with the paired healthy MCA (P < .001). Regression analysis demonstrated a significant trend toward an increased Ktrans with increasing aneurysm size (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vakil, P., Ansari, S. A., Cantrell, C. G., Eddleman, C. S., Dehkordi, F. H., Vranic, J., … Carroll, T. J. (2015). Quantifying Intracranial Aneurysm Wall Permeability for Risk Assessment Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: A Pilot Study. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 36(5), 953–959. https://doi.org/10.3174/AJNR.A4225

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free