Clinical measurement, statistical analysis, and risk-benefit: Controversies from trials of spinal injury

33Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Studies have been a series of trials assessing the role of pharmacologic agents in the prevention of secondary neuronal damage after acute spinal cord injury. Methods: The trials were multicenter randomized, controlled studies. Results: Two trials have demonstrated the efficacy of high-dose methylprednisolone in improving neurologic and functional recovery and have shown a reassuring safety profile. Conclusion: This study responds to a recent commentary on these trials and examines in particular the roles of clinical measurement, statistical analysis, and risk benefit in assembling evidence for or against innovative therapies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bracken, M. B., Aldrich, E. F., Herr, D. L., Hitchon, P. W., Holford, T. R., Marshall, L. F., … Young, W. (2000). Clinical measurement, statistical analysis, and risk-benefit: Controversies from trials of spinal injury. Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 48(3), 558–561. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200003000-00036

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free