Lineage‐specific alteration in cell cycle structure in early Tubifex embryos

9Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Embryos of the freshwater oligochaete Tubifex exhibit asynchrony in division timing as early as the second cleavage; this cleavage asynchrony becomes pronounced as development proceeds. The present study was undertaken to elucidate the composition and duration of the cell cycles of early Tubifex embryos, with special reference to their cell lineages. No significant variations in lengths of cleavage cycles were found among early embryos. In all blastomeres up to the eighth cleavage cycle, the M phase was followed directly by a 30 min S phase, which suggested that early embryos lack G1 phase. The durations of the M phase did not change during this period of development, but did differ between cell lines. The M phase in the A and B cell lines lasted for about 130 min, while the M phase in the C and D cell lines lasted for about 95 min. An examination of chromosome cycles showed that this difference in M phase durations resulted from a longer stay by the A/B cell lines in prometaphase. Only G2 phase lengthened during early development. After several rounds of G2 phase extension, three classes of G2 phase duration were established: the most extended G2 phase (∼6 h) in the first quartette of micromeres (cells 1 a–1 d), the shortest G2 phase (∼1.58 h) in teloblasts, and an intermediate G2 phase (∼2.4 h) in the progeny of macromeres (i.e. endodermal cells). Experiments with syncytial blastomeres showed that the timing of entry into the M phase, hence the duration of the G2 phase, was affected by cytoplasmic compositions. The shortest G2 phase correlated closely with the presence of yolk‐free cytoplasm called pole plasm. Copyright © 1995, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shimizu, T. (1995). Lineage‐specific alteration in cell cycle structure in early Tubifex embryos. Development, Growth & Differentiation, 37(3), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-169X.1995.t01-2-00004.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free