“It felt a bit wartime”: Teacher perspectives of social and emotional well-being support in primary schools during Covid-19

4Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Although primary schools in the UK were required to provide access to remote learning for pupils during Covid-19 mandated school closures, there was less clarity for teachers and school leaders about expectations and priorities relating to the provision of social and emotional well-being support for children at home during this period. Using an existing whole-school approaches (WSA) framework we aimed to understand the extent to which well-being support was a priority for primary schools during closures, what structures were in place to support well-being, what factors facilitated or inhibited provision of remote pastoral care, and how schools supported pupil reintegration following school reopening. Twenty semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with teachers and school leaders in primary schools in three counties of southern England during February and March 2020. A hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis approach was used with a critical realist approach. Findings indicate that school closures were associated with radically disrupted home–school partnerships. Lack of national and local policy guidance limited the extent to which schools adapted remote well-being provision and maintained contact with families. This disruption contributed to a decline in children's emotional well-being, particularly for those children from disadvantaged backgrounds. Covid recovery recommendations center on a renewed emphasis on universal, ethos-focused interventions and a strength-based focus on curriculum change.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lacey, A. J., Banerjee, R., & Lester, K. J. (2024). “It felt a bit wartime”: Teacher perspectives of social and emotional well-being support in primary schools during Covid-19. Psychology in the Schools, 61(5), 1982–1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23147

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free