Quality assessment and response to less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) without sedation

24Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Although sedative premedication for endotracheal intubation is considered standard of care, less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is often performed without sedative premedication. The aim of this study was to assess success rates, technical quality and vital parameters in LISA without sedative premedication. Methods: Prospective observational study in 86 neonates <32 weeks’ gestation. LISA was performed according to a standardized protocol without use of sedative premedication. Outcome measures were success rates of LISA attempts, reasons for failure and quality of technical conditions. In 37 neonates, heart rate and oxygen saturation levels from 20 min before until 30 min after start of LISA were collected. Results: In 48% of LISAs the first attempt failed and in 34% quality of technical conditions was inadequate. The success rate was significantly correlated with quality of technical conditions and experience of the performer. Desaturations <80% occurred in 54% of patients while bradycardia <80/min did not occur. Conclusion: This study shows a relatively low success rate of the first attempt of LISA, frequent inadequacy of technical quality and frequent oxygen desaturations. These effects may be improved by the use of sedative premedication.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Kort, E., Kusters, S., Niemarkt, H., van Pul, C., Reiss, I., Simons, S., & Andriessen, P. (2020). Quality assessment and response to less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) without sedation. Pediatric Research, 87(1), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-019-0552-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free