Comparison of cefoxitin disc diffusion test, HiCrome rapid MRSA agar and PCR for mec A, PVL and fem B genes for detection of methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

  • Wijekoon S
  • Abeygoonawardena H
  • Karawgoda R
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of cefoxitin disk diffusion as a method to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), comparing with HiCrome MRSA screening agar and PCR-based mecA gene detection. Both PCR and the cefoxitin disk diffusion test exhibited 100% sensitivity and specificity, while HiCrome agar showed slightly lower sensitivity (90%) and specificity (95.24%) out of 72 Staphylococcus aureus isolates. The MRSA detection rate was found to be 41.66%, with femB and PVL genes present in 86.6% and 13.3% of MRSA isolates, respectively. Cefoxitin could serve as a reliable substitute marker for MRSA detection, particularly in settings with limited resources.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wijekoon, S. J., Abeygoonawardena, H., Karawgoda, R. A., Chandrasiri, N. S., & Senanayake, N. P. (2023). Comparison of cefoxitin disc diffusion test, HiCrome rapid MRSA agar and PCR for mec A, PVL and fem B genes for detection of methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Ceylon Medical Journal, 68(2), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.4038/cmj.v68i2.9765

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free