Erratum: Evaluation of Antimicrobial Potential and Comparison of HPLC Composition, Secondary Metabolites Count, and Antioxidant Activity of Mentha rotundifolia and Mentha pulegium Extracts (Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine (2021) 2021 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9081536)

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the article titled “Evaluation of Antimicrobial Potential and Comparison of HPLC Composition, Secondary Metabolites Count, and Antioxidant Activity of Mentha rotundifolia and Mentha pulegium Extracts” [1], there is an error in the first affiliation. "e correct affiliation is “Department of Biology, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia” and it is corrected above..

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alharbi, N. K., Naghmouchi, S., & Al-Zaban, M. (2022). Erratum: Evaluation of Antimicrobial Potential and Comparison of HPLC Composition, Secondary Metabolites Count, and Antioxidant Activity of Mentha rotundifolia and Mentha pulegium Extracts (Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine (2021) 2021 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9081536). Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Hindawi Limited. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9767418

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free