Spiderman and the Burma Raiders: Collateral Organization Theory in Action

22Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A collateral organization is designed to co-exist parallel with the formal organization on a relatively permanent basis. Proponents contend that collateral organizations prove especially valuable in supplementing the formal organization because they provide (1) a means for identifying, analyzing, and mastering ill-structured problems and (2) an arena for participation. Advocates concede, however, that the parallel arrangement offormal and collateral organizations creates a complexity that may confuse participants and cause role problems. To the contrary, this article argues that the proclaimed “advantages” of collateral organizations are problematic while their “problems” actually provide the paramount advantage. Despite claims by proponents, a collateral organization is (1) not inherently a proficient medium for solving-or even seeing-ill-structured problems, and (2) is no less prone to abuse of participation than other participatory forms. Yet collateral organizations offer the invaluable advantage of complex role sets-i.e., interaction opportunities with a large number of very different people. Complex role sets may enhance mastery of the environment for both individuals and organizations. © 1984, JAI PRESS INC. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rubinstein, D., & Woodman, R. W. (1984). Spiderman and the Burma Raiders: Collateral Organization Theory in Action. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 20(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638402000104

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free