The Effectiveness of Digital vs. Analogue Teaching Resources in a Flipped Classroom for Undergraduate Focus Cardiac Ultrasound Training: A Prospective, Randomised, Controlled Single-Centre Study

4Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: This study investigated the effectiveness of e-learning compared to traditional teaching methods in ultrasound education, centring on a focus cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) course for third-year undergraduate medical students. With the rise of digital teaching methods, it is essential to evaluate their impact on the development of theoretical and practical skills in ultrasound training. Methods: A prospective, randomised, controlled trial was conducted involving two groups of students participating in a one-day FoCUS course delivered in a flipped classroom format. The study group used e-learning resources, while the control group used hard-copy lecture notes. Assessments were conducted at three stages: before the course, during the preparation phase, and after the course. Evaluations included self-assessment surveys, theory tests, and practical exams using direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) tests. The study group had 15% less practice time compared to the control group. Results: A total of 109 complete datasets (study group, n = 52; control group, n = 57) were analysed. Both groups showed an equivalent initial level of and a continuous and significant (p < 0.01) increase in subjective and objective skills over the evaluated time frame. The study group achieved significantly (p = 0.03) higher results in DOPS (T2) than the control group. No significant differences were found in the total scores of the theory tests (T2 + T3) or DOPS (T3). Both groups rated their teaching materials, motivation, and the course concept in similarly high scale ranges. Conclusions: The findings suggest that e-learning is as effective as traditional methods in developing ultrasound skills and may serve as a viable alternative, even with reduced face-to-face interaction. These results indicate that accreditation processes could be applied similarly to those for traditional formats without requiring in-person training as a prerequisite for quality

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weimer, J., Recker, F., Krüger, R., Müller, L., Buggenhagen, H., Kurz, S., … Weinmann-Menke, J. (2025). The Effectiveness of Digital vs. Analogue Teaching Resources in a Flipped Classroom for Undergraduate Focus Cardiac Ultrasound Training: A Prospective, Randomised, Controlled Single-Centre Study. Education Sciences, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070810

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free