Differences in Sustained Cellular Effects of MET inhibitors Are Driven by Prolonged Target Engagement and Lysosomal Retention

3Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Intracellular distribution of drug compounds is dependent on physicochemical characteristics and may have a significant bearing on the extent of target occupancy and, ultimately, drug efficacy. We assessed differences in the physicochemical profiles ofMET inhibitors capmatinib, crizotinib, savolitinib, and tepotinib and their effects on cell viability and MET phosphorylation under steady-state and washout conditions (tomimic an open organic system) in a human lung cancer cell line. To examine the differences of the underlying molecular mechanisms at the receptor level, we investigated the residence time at the kinase domain and the cellular target engagement. We found that the ranking of the drugs for cell viability was different under steady-state and washout conditions and that under washout conditions, tepotinib displayed the most potent inhibition of phosphorylated MET. Postwashout effectswere correlated with the partitioning of the drug into acidic subcellular compartments such as lysosomes, and the tested MET inhibitors were grouped according to their ability to access lysosomes (crizotinib and tepotinib) or not (capmatinib and savolitinib). Reversible lysosomal retention may represent a valuable intracellular storage mechanism for MET inhibitors, enabling prolonged receptor occupancy in dynamic, open-physiologic systems and may act as a local drug reservoir. The use of washout conditions to simulate open systems and investigate intracellular drug distribution is a useful characterization step that deserves further investigation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Berges, N., Klug, J. H., Eicher, A., Loehr, J., Schwarz, D., Bomke, J., … Schadt, O. (2023). Differences in Sustained Cellular Effects of MET inhibitors Are Driven by Prolonged Target Engagement and Lysosomal Retention. Molecular Pharmacology, 103(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1124/molpharm.122.000590

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free