Myopia onset and role of peripheral refraction

38Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: To determine the peripheral refraction characteristics related to 18-month changes in refraction in Caucasian (Mediterranean) children. Methods: Non-cycloplegic peripheral refraction at 10ointervals over the central ±30oof horizontal visual field over 18 months (baseline, 12 months, and 18 months of follow-up) was conducted in 50 healthy children who were 8 years old. Axial length (AL) was also recorded. Relative peripheral refraction (RPR) was calculated and eyes were divided into three study groups: non-myopic eyes, myopic eyes, and eyes that develop myopia. Results: Myopic eyes showed hyperopic RPR and emetropic and hyperopic eyes showed myopic RPR. Univariate analysis of variance did not find any statistically significant effect of peripheral refraction (F36=0.13; P=1.00) and RPR (F36=0.79; P=0.80) on myopia onset (eyes that developed myopia along the study). All the studied groups showed an increase of AL, without statistically significant differences between the studied groups (F6=0.09; P=0.99). Conclusion: Hyperopic relative peripheral shift change in eyes that develop myopia has been found with differences in RPR between myopic (hyperopic RPR) and hyperopic or emmetropic eyes (with myopic RPR). The results suggest that RPR cannot predict development or progression of myopia in Caucasian (Mediterranean) children and the efficacy in slowing myopia progression obtained with treatments that manipulate the peripheral refraction is not just driven with RPR.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rotolo, M., Montani, G., & Martin, R. (2017). Myopia onset and role of peripheral refraction. Clinical Optometry, 9, 105–111. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S134985

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free