Comparison of automatic image registration uncertainty for three IGRT systems using a male pelvis phantom

12Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A series of phantom images using the CIRS Virtual Human Male Pelvis was acquired across available dose ranges for three image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) imaging systems: Elekta XVI CBCT, Varian TrueBeam CBCT, and TomoTherapy MV CT. Each image was registered to a fan-beam CT within the XVI software 100 times with random initial offsets. The residual registration error was analyzed to assess the role of imaging hardware and reconstruction in the uncertainty of the IGRT process. Residual translation errors were similar for all systems and < 0.5 mm. Over the clinical dose range for prostate IGRT images (10-25 mGy), all imaging systems provided acceptable matches in > 90% of registrations when incorporating residual rotational error using a dual quaternion derived distance metric. Outside normal dose settings, large uncertainties were observed at very low and very high dose levels. No trend between initial offset and residual registration error was observed. Patient images may incur higher uncertainties than this phantom study; however, these results encourage automatic matching for standard dose settings with review by treatment staff.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barber, J., Sykes, J. R., Holloway, L., & Thwaites, D. I. (2016). Comparison of automatic image registration uncertainty for three IGRT systems using a male pelvis phantom. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 17(5), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i5.6332

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free