Psychological capital research: A meta-analysis and implications for management sustainability

37Citations
Citations of this article
236Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to conduct a wide-ranging meta-analytic review of empirical psychological capital studies in the management field. We conducted a meta-analysis on papers collected from the EBSCOhost and ProQuest databases. For comprehensive and extensive literature coverage, we also searched and compared the Journal Citation Report for the journals that referenced the most-cited articles (e.g., Journal of Organizational Behavior, Academy of Management Journal, etc.). A total of 81 published types of research were thoroughly selected and analyzed. The results revealed that, with different weighting, the following influencing factors have significant associations with psychological capital: organizational climate, organizational justice, authentic leadership, leader-member exchange, and occupational stress. Also, with different influencing weighting, psychological capital is confirmed to have impacts on job satisfaction, attitude, performance, organizational citizenship behavior, and undesirable behaviors. Implications for managerial sustainability are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kong, F., Tsai, C. H., Tsai, F. S., Huang, W., & de la Cruz, S. M. (2018). Psychological capital research: A meta-analysis and implications for management sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103457

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free