Seismic Design and Risk Analyses of Safe-to-Fail Steel and RC Frames for Nuclear Facilities

  • Mangkoesoebroto S
  • Rianto S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Abstract In this article, the design and estimate of the collapse risk of safe-to-fail steel and reinforced concrete (RC) frames due to earthquakes were proposed. The frames are part of nuclear facility buildings, and their failures are to follow the safe-to-fail beam side-sway collapse mechanism. The safe-to-fail was dictated by allowing plastic hinges to form merely in beams and few in columns; no other failure but flexure was tolerated such as shear, local or lateraltorsional buckling. Two types of safe-to-fail frames were studied, one with special moment frame (SMF) and the other with ordinary moment frame (OMF). The design was elaborated, and the fragility-based collapse risks were estimated and compared. Nonlinear time history analyses were carried out to evaluate the structural performance. The analyses showed that the safe-to-fail OMF had lower collapse risk than the safe-to-fail SMF for both steel and concrete frames. The steel safe-to-fail OMF showed superior behaviours. Keywords: Safe-to-fail; concrete and steel frames; fragility; collapse risk; earthquake; time history analysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mangkoesoebroto, S. P., & Rianto, S. (2024). Seismic Design and Risk Analyses of Safe-to-Fail Steel and RC Frames for Nuclear Facilities. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 31(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.5614/jts.2024.31.2.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free