Effective healthcare cost-containment policies: A systematic review

122Citations
Citations of this article
387Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Unsustainable growth in healthcare expenditure demands effective cost-containment policies. We review policy effectiveness using total payer expenditure as primary outcome measure. We included all OECD member states from 1970 onward. After a rigorous quality appraisal, we included 43 original studies and 18 systematic reviews that cover 341 studies. Policies most often evaluated were payment reforms (10 studies), managed care (8 studies) and cost sharing (6 studies). Despite the importance of this topic, for many widely-used policies very limited evidence is available on their effectiveness in containing healthcare costs. We found no evidence for 21 of 41 major groups of cost-containment policies. Furthermore, many evaluations displayed a high risk of bias. Therefore, policies should be more routinely and rigorously evaluated after implementation. The available high-quality evidence suggests that the cost curve may best be bent using a combination of cost sharing, managed care competition, reference pricing, generic substitution and tort reform.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stadhouders, N., Kruse, F., Tanke, M., Koolman, X., & Jeurissen, P. (2019, January 1). Effective healthcare cost-containment policies: A systematic review. Health Policy. Elsevier Ireland Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.10.015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free