No-touch disinfection methods to decrease multidrug-resistant organism infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis

96Citations
Citations of this article
119Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND Recent studies have shown that using no-touch disinfection technologies (ie, ultraviolet light [UVL] or hydrogen peroxide vapor [HPV] systems) can limit the transmission of nosocomial pathogens and prevent healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). To investigate these findings further, we performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on the impact of no-touch disinfection methods to decrease HAIs. METHODS We searched PubMed, CINAHL, CDSR, DARE and EMBASE through April 2017 for studies evaluating no-touch disinfection technology and the nosocomial infection rates for Clostridium difficile, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and other multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). We employed random-effect models to obtain pooled risk ratio (pRR) estimates. Heterogeneity was evaluated with I2 estimation and the Cochran Q statistic. Pooled risk ratios for C. difficile, MRSA, VRE, and MDRO were assessed separately. RESULTS In total, 20 studies were included in the final review: 13 studies using UVL systems and 7 studies using HPV systems. When the results of the UVL studies were pooled, statistically significant reduction ins C. difficile infection (CDI) (pRR, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-0.84) and VRE infection rates (pRR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.28-0.65) were observed. No differences were found in rates of MRSA or gram-negative multidrug-resistant pathogens. CONCLUSIONS Ultraviolet light no-touch disinfection technology may be effective in preventing CDI and VRE infection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marra, A. R., Schweizer, M. L., & Edmond, M. B. (2018). No-touch disinfection methods to decrease multidrug-resistant organism infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 39(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2017.226

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free