Impact of dental prosthetic treatment and patients' expectations on the seven domains and four-dimensional scale of the Oral Health Impact Profile

Abstract

Background: Recently, recommendations were given for a new scoring of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP). The original seven domain structure should be replaced by a four-dimensional scale. Objectives: To investigate the effect of dental prosthetic treatment on the seven domains and the four-dimensional scale of the OHIP-G49/53 questionnaire. Methods: Seventy four patients were grouped according their pre- and post-treatment situation and the type of treatment they received. Patients completed the OHIP-G49/53 questionnaire before prosthetic treatment (T0), and at 1 week (T1), 3 months (T2) and 6 months (T3) after treatment. Treatment effects on the seven domains and the four dimensions of the OHIP scale were analysed, and the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) was measured. Patients' expectations of their prosthetic treatment were also evaluated. Data were analysed using two-way Mixed ANOVA, regression analysis, and Cronbach's alpha test with a level of significance of α ≤.017. Results: OHRQoL significantly improved following prosthetic treatment compared with baseline. The largest improvement was found between T0 and T1 evaluations (all p ≤.001). Unlike the seven-domain scale, the four OHIP dimensions demonstrated further significant improvements across the T1/T2/T3 evaluations (all p ≤.017). Different pre-treatment findings had different treatment effects on the four OHIP dimensions and seven OHIP domains. Patients' expectations were mainly fulfilled. Conclusion: Compared with the seven-domain scale, the four dimensions showed significant follow-up changes, suggesting the four dimensions are suitable for evaluating treatment effects up to 6 months. Clinically meaningful effects of dental prosthetic treatment can be sensitively measured using the four-dimensional OHIP scale.