The UN Committee Against Torture: Human rights monitoring and the legal recognition of cruelty

37Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Focusing on the Committee Against Torture, this article argues that human rights monitoring can hide as much as it reveals. In particular, monitoring should be understood as a "second order" process that displaces the discussion of the causes and consequences of violence in favor of a focus on the systems that are supposed to monitor cruelty. In this process, measurements, monitoring, and prevention are in danger of becoming merged. As such, the ways in which the Committee Against Torture produces and assesses information serves simultaneously to create a depoliticized conception of violence and to reproduce political inequalities between states. © 2009 by The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kelly, T. (2009). The UN Committee Against Torture: Human rights monitoring and the legal recognition of cruelty. Human Rights Quarterly, 31(3), 777–800. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.0.0094

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free