Energetics of middle-distance running performances in male and female junior using track measurements

13Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the energetic factors of middle-distance running performance in junior elite runners according to gender and by using measurements from on-track performances. Fifteen elite runners (8 males and 7 females) were investigated by means of an incremental test and an all-out run over 600 m performed with a 2-d interval. We calculated (1) the aerobic maximal power (Ėr max aero, in W kg-1), including V̇O2 max and the delay of attainment of V̇O 2 max in the 600 m run; (2) the anaerobic power (Ė r max anaero), i.e., the oxygen deficit (J kg-1) divided by the duration of the 600 m run. Despite the difference in race duration (87±3 vs. 102±2 s), the 600 m run was made at the same relative value of the velocity associated with V̇O2 max (V V̇O2 max) in males and females (121.6±7 vs. 120±8% V̇O2 max, p=0.7). Ėr max aero explained most of the variance in the performance (the personal best performed 8 weeks later) between genders: 65 and 79% over 800 m (T800) and 1,500 m (T 1,500). For females, Ėr max aero explained most of the variance of T1,500 (r2=0.66), and Ė r max anaero improved this prediction (r2=0.84). No energetic factor predicted the performance on 800 m run in males. In elite junior athletes, the energetic model with individual data measured over an all-out 600 m performed on a track, provides an explanation for most of the variance in middle-distance running performances between genders. The distinction between aerobic power and anaerobic power allowed an improvement in the prediction of middle-distance running performances.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Billat, V. L., Lepretre, P. M., Heugas, A. M., & Pierre Koralsztein, J. (2004). Energetics of middle-distance running performances in male and female junior using track measurements. Japanese Journal of Physiology, 54(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.2170/jjphysiol.54.125

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free