Benchmarking urban six-degree-of-freedom simultaneous localization and mapping

46Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Quite a number of approaches for solving the simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) problem exist by now. Some of them have recently been extended to mapping environments with six-degree-of-freedom poses, yielding 6D SLAM approaches. To demonstrate the capabilities of the respective algorithms, it is common practice to present generated maps and successful loop closings in large outdoor environments. Unfortunately, it is nontrivial to compare different 6D SLAM approaches objectively, because ground truth data about the outdoor environments used for demonstration are typically unavailable. We present a novel benchmarking method for generating the ground truth data based on reference maps. The method is then demonstrated by comparing the absolute performance of some previously existing 6D SLAM algorithms that build a large urban outdoor map. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wulf, O., Nüchter, A., Hertzberg, J., & Wagner, B. (2008). Benchmarking urban six-degree-of-freedom simultaneous localization and mapping. Journal of Field Robotics, 25(3), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.20234

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free