Abstract
QUESTION: Does the choice of surgical approach (anterior, posterior, or combined anterior-posterior) improve clinical outcomes in patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures? RECOMMENDATIONS: In the surgical treatment of patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures, physicians may use an anterior, posterior, or a combined approach as the selection of approach does not appear to impact clinical or neurological outcomes. Strength of Recommendation: Grade B With regard to radiologic outcomes in the surgical treatment of patients with thoracolumbar fractures, physicians may utilize an anterior, posterior, or combined approach because there is conflicting evidence in the comparison among approaches. Strength of Recommendation: Grade Insufficient With regard to complications in the surgical treatment of patients with thoracolumbar fractures, physicians may use an anterior, posterior, or combined approach because there is conflicting evidence in the comparison among approaches.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Anderson, P. A., Raksin, P. B., Arnold, P. M., Chi, J. H., Dailey, A. T., Dhall, S. S., … O’Toole, J. E. (2019, January 1). Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma: Surgical approaches. Clinical Neurosurgery. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy363
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.