Collective wage bargaining and the role of institutional stability: A cross-national comparison of macroeconomic performance

6Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Since the advent of the economic crisis, interest in the efficacy of collective wage bargaining institutions has increased as the labour market was required to bear the burden of economic adjustment and became an important policy-field for institutional reform in many countries. In this article, the role of institutional stability, trust and certainty for the efficacy of collective bargaining systems is investigated and their effects on macroeconomic outcomes—inflation and unemployment—are analysed.We argue that stability of the institutional framework of collective bargaining is of major importance for its efficacy as it reduces uncertainty and provides the necessary basis for trust among bargaining actors. Thus, we hypothesise that institutional change and instability are associated with significant transaction costs and have, at least temporarily, negative effects on economic outcomes. The hypotheses are confirmed by an empirical analysis, which uses data of 34 industrialised countries from 1965 to 2014.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brandl, B., & Ibsen, C. L. (2019). Collective wage bargaining and the role of institutional stability: A cross-national comparison of macroeconomic performance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 43(3), 677–694. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bey041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free