Abstract
Numerous natural disasters happen in the world annually and damages resulting from disasters and their consequences on development achievements are increasing in human communities. Hence, Post-disaster reconstruction has been developed in all aspects during the last years. The present article classifies the views of experts on post-disaster reconstruction and compares this reconstruction paradigm with the reconstruction process in Iran. This research has been conducted in the theoretical principles section of post-disaster reconstruction and is done in four steps: studying the views in post-disaster reconstruction field within a thirty-years period since 1982 to 2012; analyzing the views of the post-disaster reconstruction experts; deriving post-disaster reconstruction paradigm's components using Grounded Theory method; and comparative study of post-disaster reconstruction paradigm and Iranian expert's perspective of reconstruction by in-depth interviews with 10 Iranian expert who were involved in reconstruction in Iran during that period. The first part results include paradigms: Encouraging people for participation, individuals and groups participation, Procedural planning and Proactive management. Comparing these with Iranian's experiences, shows that a systematic reconstruction plan should be based on recognition of local characteristics of region and the needs of the affected population besides the other results.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Andalib, A., & Majd, F. N. (2017). Comparative Study of Post-disaster Reconstruction Paradigm and Iranian Experts’ Perspective of Reconstruction. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 6(1), 326. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i1.745
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.