Predictors of Exclusive Breastfeeding for 6 Months in a National Sample of US Children

48Citations
Citations of this article
162Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To explore predictors of breastfeeding behavior and seek to replicate prior findings using a recent nationally representative United States (US) sample, which has not been done previously. Design: Secondary data analysis using the National Survey of Children’s Health 2011 to 2012. Setting: Households in the 50 US states, the District of Columbia, and the US Virgin Islands. Participants: Caregivers with a child between 6 months and 6 years of age (n = 26 552). Measures: Caregiver-reported child breastfeeding behavior, child birth weight, child/maternal/family demographics, maternal physical and mental health, and household tobacco exposure. Analysis: A multinomial logistic regression explored whether child, maternal, and family characteristics predicted exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months or breastfeeding for a suboptimal duration. Results: Approximately 79% and 17% of the sample-initiated breastfeeding and exclusively breastfed for 6 months, respectively. Child ethnicity/race, maternal education, household tobacco exposure, family composition, and family income predicted odds of both exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months and breastfeeding for a suboptimal duration or not exclusively. Normal or high child birth weight and better maternal physical health predicted greater odds of exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months. Conclusion: Rates of exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months remain low in the United States. Single-parent and step-families, lower income families, non-Hispanic black children, children with exposure to tobacco, and children of mothers with lower education are at greatest risk.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Odar Stough, C., Khalsa, A. S., Nabors, L. A., Merianos, A. L., & Peugh, J. (2019). Predictors of Exclusive Breastfeeding for 6 Months in a National Sample of US Children. American Journal of Health Promotion, 33(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117118774208

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free