Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this article is to address research gaps relating to agency and institutionalism in new institutional theory (NIT) and institutional work (IW) and use the critical sensemaking (CSM) approach to bridge the debates around agency, especially on issues of language and discourse, actor network theory (ANT) and history. Design/methodology/approach: A conceptual analysis of the literature is performed to discuss issues of agency in IW and CSM in organizations, and examples of empirical studies are used to illustrate connectivity, contrast and fusion. Findings: The analysis illustrates points of distance (rather than disconnect), but most importantly, connectivity and the potential for further developments between the literature on IW and CSM. Social implications: Discussion around new possibilities to focus on agency has the potential to contribute to humanist thinking about the (agentic) character of organizations and the potential for social change. Originality/value: The article contributes to the discussion of agency in the organization through a starting point (i.e. CSM) outside of NIT.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Mills, A. J., Eriksson, P., Aromaa, E., & Palo-Oja, O. M. (2023). Mind the gap! Building bridges between institutional work and critical sensemaking. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 36(8), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-06-2023-0234
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.