Mind the gap! Building bridges between institutional work and critical sensemaking

6Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to address research gaps relating to agency and institutionalism in new institutional theory (NIT) and institutional work (IW) and use the critical sensemaking (CSM) approach to bridge the debates around agency, especially on issues of language and discourse, actor network theory (ANT) and history. Design/methodology/approach: A conceptual analysis of the literature is performed to discuss issues of agency in IW and CSM in organizations, and examples of empirical studies are used to illustrate connectivity, contrast and fusion. Findings: The analysis illustrates points of distance (rather than disconnect), but most importantly, connectivity and the potential for further developments between the literature on IW and CSM. Social implications: Discussion around new possibilities to focus on agency has the potential to contribute to humanist thinking about the (agentic) character of organizations and the potential for social change. Originality/value: The article contributes to the discussion of agency in the organization through a starting point (i.e. CSM) outside of NIT.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mills, A. J., Eriksson, P., Aromaa, E., & Palo-Oja, O. M. (2023). Mind the gap! Building bridges between institutional work and critical sensemaking. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 36(8), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-06-2023-0234

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free