How well can the exponential-growth coalescent approximate constant-rate birth–death population dynamics?

32Citations
Citations of this article
110Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

One of the central objectives in the field of phylodynamics is the quantification of population dynamic processes using genetic sequence data or in some cases phenotypic data. Phylodynamics has been successfully applied to many different processes, such as the spread of infectious diseases, within-host evolution of a pathogen, macroevolution and even language evolution. Phylodynamic analysis requires a probability distribution on phylogenetic trees spanned by the genetic data. Because such a probability distribution is not available for many common stochastic population dynamic processes, coalescent-based approximations assuming deterministic population size changes are widely employed. Key to many population dynamic models, in particular epidemiological models, is a period of exponential population growth during the initial phase. Here, we show that the coalescent does not well approximate stochastic exponential population growth, which is typically modelled by a birth–death process. We demonstrate that introducing demographic stochasticity into the population size function of the coalescent improves the approximation for values of R0 close to 1, but substantial differences remain for large R0. In addition, the computational advantage of using an approximation over exact models vanishes when introducing such demographic stochasticity. These results highlight that we need to increase efforts to develop phylodynamic tools that correctly account for the stochasticity of population dynamic models for inference.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stadler, T., Vaughan, T. G., Gavryushkin, A., Guindon, S., Kühnert, D., Leventhal, G. E., & Drummond, A. J. (2015). How well can the exponential-growth coalescent approximate constant-rate birth–death population dynamics? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1806). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.0420

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free