A critical evaluation of Quintner etal: Missing the point

21Citations
Citations of this article
117Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The objective of this article is to critically analyze a recent publication by Quinter, Bove and Cohen, published in Rheumatology, about myofascial pain syndrome and trigger points (Quintner etal., 2014). The authors concluded that the leading trigger point hypothesis is flawed in reasoning and in science. They claimed to have refuted the trigger point hypothesis. The current paper demonstrates that the Quintner etal. paper is a biased review of the literature replete with unsupported opinions and accusations. In summary, Quintner etal. have not presented any convincing evidence to believe that the Integrated TrP Hypothesis should be laid to rest.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dommerholt, J., & Gerwin, R. D. (2015, April 1). A critical evaluation of Quintner etal: Missing the point. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. Churchill Livingstone. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.01.009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free