Timing and type of personal protective equipment adherence lapses in pediatric trauma resuscitation: A retrospective video study

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background Although personal protective equipment (PPE) reduces the transmission of infectious diseases, adherence among health care providers remains inconsistent. Developing strategies to improve PPE use requires understanding the factors associated with adherence lapses, defined as the partial undoing or removal of PPE, leading to nonadherence. Methods We performed a retrospective video review of 10 pediatric trauma resuscitations from March 2023 to July 2024. We recorded the number of lapses, the time from adherence to lapse (time-to-lapse), and the timing of lapses during resuscitation. We observed provider actions before and after a lapse to understand situational factors. Results We observed 292 lapses among 120 providers. The median time-to-lapse was 7.7 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 3.8-15.1) for gloves, 1.5 minutes (IQR 0.3-6.8) for masks, and 13.4 minutes (IQR 6.6-26.6) for gowns. Lapses in masks (estimate −0.4, 95% confidence interval −0.6 to −0.3, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, M. S., Arkowitz, D. W., Currie, A. A., Sarcevic, A., & Burd, R. S. (2025). Timing and type of personal protective equipment adherence lapses in pediatric trauma resuscitation: A retrospective video study. American Journal of Infection Control, 53(12), 1325–1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.08.023

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free