Heterogeneity in esophageal and gastric cardia precursor progression during six-year endoscopic surveillance after population-based screening in a Chinese high-risk region

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The study was conducted to examine esophageal and gastric cardia precursor progression. Methods: After population-based baseline screening, 145 precursor and 335 chronic inflammation cases were endoscopically surveyed for six years. Results: Surveillance of interval and baseline diagnoses for 18 severe dysplasia (SD) cases later detected were: 13, 23, 39, and 44 months since a diagnosis of chronic inflammation in four cases; 6, 6, 6, 11, 13, 16, 16, and 23 months since mild dysplasia (mD) diagnoses in eight; and 6, 9, 10, 13, 18, and 48 months since moderate dysplasia (MD) diagnoses in six. Rates for 11 carcinoma in situ (Cis) cases later detected were: 7 and 18 months since basal cell hyperplasia (Bch) diagnoses in two; and 6, 6, 9, 13, 13, 18, 35, 44, and 50 months since MD diagnoses in nine. In 10 cancer cases later detected, rates were: 6, 6, 7, 18, 19, 34, 36, and 48 months since SD diagnoses in eight cases with submucosal carcinoma; 46 months since MD diagnosis in a T 2 N 0 M 0 carcinoma case; and 52 months since Bch diagnosis in another T 2 N 0 M 0 case. Conclusion: Esophageal and gastric cardia precursors are heterogeneous. Male gender, advanced age, family history of upper gastrointestinal cancer, and multifocal dysplasia are significant independent predictors for progression, and Bch/mD, MD, and SD constitute three distinctive entities regarding the risk of cancer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wen, D., Zhang, L., Wang, X., Wen, X., Yang, Y., Chen, Y., … Shan, B. (2017). Heterogeneity in esophageal and gastric cardia precursor progression during six-year endoscopic surveillance after population-based screening in a Chinese high-risk region. Thoracic Cancer, 8(4), 328–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12446

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free