Asymmetric connectedness between conventional and Islamic cryptocurrencies: Evidence from good and bad volatility spillovers

7Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper examines the dynamics of the asymmetric volatility spillovers across four major cryptocurrencies comprising nearly 61% of cryptocurrency market capitalization and covering both conventional (Bitcoin and Ethereum) and Islamic (Stellar and Ripple) cryptocurrencies. Using a novel time-varying parameter vector autoregression (TVP-VAR) asymmetric connectedness approach combined with a high frequency (hourly) dataset ranging from 1st June 2018 to 22nd July 2022, we find that (i) good and bad spillovers are time-varying; (ii) bad volatility spillovers are more pronounced than good spillovers; (iii) a strong asymmetry in the volatility spillovers exists in the cryptocurrency market; and (iv) conventional cryptocurrencies dominate Islamic cryptocurrencies. Specifically, Ethereum is the major net transmitter of positive volatility spillovers while Stellar is the main net transmitter of negative volatility spillovers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bouri, E., Ghaemi Asl, M., Darehshiri, S., & Gabauer, D. (2024). Asymmetric connectedness between conventional and Islamic cryptocurrencies: Evidence from good and bad volatility spillovers. Financial Innovation, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00636-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free