Canvas Five Year LMS Accreditation Reporting Using Rubrics and Assignments

1Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There is a surprisingly large gap between measuring inputs to a program and outputs from that program. Accreditation requirements have added an increasingly burdensome workload to degree-plan and course administration. The ease with which one can design assignments and their corresponding rubrics does not freely translate to assessing student response to those assignments. The challenge is to deploy assessment tools that are easy to understand, administer, deploy, and learn from. This paper focuses on the assessment of assignments evaluated by detailed rubrics. We describe tools and processes that enable us to examine years of data at a granularity not directly supported by our LMS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shepherd, I., Reeves, B., & Pope, D. (2023). Canvas Five Year LMS Accreditation Reporting Using Rubrics and Assignments. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(3), 202–216. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i3.5866

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free