Comparison of Health Buddy® with Traditional Approaches to Heart Failure Management

59Citations
Citations of this article
138Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The purpose of this pilot study was to (a) determine the feasibility of providing a heart failure disease management program through an in-home telehealth communication device (Health Buddy®) and (b) compare the effectiveness of the Health Buddy® with traditional home management strategies (telephonic, home visit) in achieving selected patient outcomes (self-efficacy, functional status, depression, and health-related quality of life). Ninety participants completed the study through 2 months. Thirty percent of participants were either eliminated prior to or withdrawn after enrollment from the study based on Health Buddy® issues. A mixed model ANOVA revealed those who received telephonic disease management experienced decreased confidence in their ability to manage their heart failure whereas all other groups experienced increased confidence. Further ANOVA analyses indicated improvement over time with no group differences for functional status, depression, or health-related quality of life. These findings suggest that delivering a disease management program through a telehealth communication device is feasible and may be as effective as traditional methods. © 2003 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

LaFramboise, L. M., Todero, C. M., Zimmerman, L., & Agrawal, S. (2003). Comparison of Health Buddy® with Traditional Approaches to Heart Failure Management. Family and Community Health, 26(4), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003727-200310000-00005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free