Self-Control and Crime: Beyond Gottfredson & Hirschi's Theory

115Citations
Citations of this article
293Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Over the past several decades, Gottfredson & Hirschi's self-control theory (SCT) has dominated research on self-control and crime. In this review, I assess the current state of self-control knowledge and encourage the field to move beyond SCT, as its peculiar conceptualization of self-control and the causal model present challenges for integrative scholarship. Drawing heavily on scholarship outside criminology, I clarify the definition of self-control; describe the malleable nature of trait self-control; highlight its situational variability as state self-control; and consider the multiplicity of contextual, situational, and individual factors that affect its operation in relation to crime. This specification of contingencies and the interplay between impulse strength and control efforts in the process of self-control is intended as a springboard for research moving beyond SCT and its key premise that self-control (ability) is sufficient to explain individual variation in crime (i.e., is tantamount to criminality). Finally, I address what I see as important areas for further study in light of current knowledge.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burt, C. H. (2020, January 13). Self-Control and Crime: Beyond Gottfredson & Hirschi’s Theory. Annual Review of Criminology. Annual Reviews Inc. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011419-041344

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free