The presence of toxocara eggs on dog’s fur as potential zoonotic risk in animal-assisted interventions: A systematic review

25Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) usually contribute to the well-being and health of users/patients, but it is essential that the animals involved in these activities do not represent a source of zoonoses. This systematic review focused on the evaluation of the potential risk of the transmission of Toxocara by dogs’ fur, considering their involvement as the main animal species in AAIs. Three databases were considered: MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, and the PRISMA guidelines were used. Out of 162 articles found, 14 papers were identified as eligible for inclusion in the review. Although the findings were very heterogeneous, they showed that regular parasitological surveillance to plan effective control programs is strongly needed to guarantee the health of pets and consequently the public health, according to the concept of One Health. Since AAIs involve patients and/or users potentially susceptible, it is very important to appropriately treat dogs enrolled in these interventions after an accurate diagnosis of parasitic zoonoses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maurelli, M. P., Santaniello, A., Fioretti, A., Cringoli, G., Rinaldi, L., & Menna, L. F. (2019, October 1). The presence of toxocara eggs on dog’s fur as potential zoonotic risk in animal-assisted interventions: A systematic review. Animals. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100827

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free