Abstract
Particle-surface collisions have been the object of a number of studies. In two of these studies, Dahneke (1971) and Wall et al (1990) derived simple models for predicting collision dynamics and particle bounce or capture. Neither model has yet provided full rationalization of measured bounce-or-capture data. In fact, the two models sometimes predict different results. Some confusion is evident, as is the need for a simple, reliable theory founded on basic physical laws to provide improved understanding of simple collisions and guide modeling of more complex ones. We rederive the Dahneke and Wall et al models considering the collision process in greater detail. We consider the simplest particle-surface-collision processes, namely, the idealized collision of a homogeneous, solid, non-rotating particle (a perfect sphere or right circular cylinder striking a surface end-on with its symmetry axis oriented normal to the surface) moving at normal incidence towards a flat, smooth surface of a solid body in vacuum. We find the models apply for complementary ranges of adhesion-energy increase during impact, ΔE = Er — Ei where Ei and Er are the interaction potential energies for the incident- and rebound-state particle-surface system. The Wall model applies for ΔE>0 and the Dahneke model for ΔE<0. On the basis that ΔE<0 is expected in particle-surface collisions, the Dahneke model is the physically reasonable one for the simplest collisions considered here, but in most cases the information provided by the two is essentially equivalent. A model is compared to measured collision-dynamics data for 1.27-μm-diameter polystyrene spheres in vacuum bouncing from thick, fused-silica and from thin (140 nm thick), gold-foil targets, under conditions approaching those of the simplest collision process. The basis for a new, dynamic model is described and discussed.As an introduction to the 1993 symposium on particle-surface interactions, the nearly 20 years of research on that topic at Berkeley is reviewed. Four main processes are covered—electrical charge transfer between particles and surfaces during impaction, particle energy loss and adhesion to surfaces in impaction, particle resuspension induced by particle impaction, and deagglomeration of particles by impaction. All of these processes are strongly dependent on the physical and chemical condition of the surfaces. Electrical charge transfer is particularly sensitive to the surface condition and can be used to test methods of surface preparation. Contact charging depends on the contact area and its time dependence and can therefore be used to test dynamic models of impaction. The elastic limit is exceeded in most materials, even near the critical velocity for particle bounce. At high impact velocities, it is necessary to take into account the dependence of the yield velocity on the rate of stress application. More experimental work is needed to improve understanding of the impaction of particles on surfaces, including nonnormal incidence and rough surfaces. Theoretical models are needed which are more general and which take into account all the sources of energy loss. The topics of resuspension and deagglomeration by particle impaction are still in the early stages of exploration. © 1995 American Association for Aerosol Research Published by Elsevier Science Inc.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Dahneke, B. (1995). Particle bounce or capture—search for an adequate theory: I. conservation-of-energy model for a simple collision process. Aerosol Science and Technology, 23(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829508965292
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.