Abstract
Alan Patten presents his account of minority rights as broadly continuous with Ronald Dworkin’s theory of equality of resources. This paper challenges this claim. I argue that, contra Patten, Dworkin’s theory does not provide a basis to offer accommodations or minority rights, as a matter of justice, to some citizens who find themselves at a relative disadvantage in pursuing their plans of life after voluntarily changing their cultural or religious commitments.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Quong, J. (2016). Equality, Responsibility, and Culture: A Comment on Alan Patten’s Equal Recognition. Les Ateliers de l’éthique, 10(2), 157. https://doi.org/10.7202/1035335ar
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.