Are we paying a high price for surgical sympathectomy? A systematic literature review of late complications

82Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to systematically review the literature in order to assess (1) the current indications for surgical sympathectomy and (2) the incidence of late complications collectively and per indication. All types of upper or lower limb surgical sympathectomies are included. An extensive search strategy looked for controlled trials and observational studies or case series with an English abstract. Out of 1,024 abstracts from MEDLINE and 221 from EMBASE, 135 articles reporting on 22,458 patients and 42,061 procedures (up to April 1998) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Weighted means were used to control for heterogeneity of data. No controlled trials were found. The main indication was primary hyperhidrosis in 84.3% of the patients. Compensatory hyperhidrosis occurred in 52.3%, gustatory sweating in 32.3%, phantom sweating in 38.6%, and Horner's syndrome in 2.4% of patients, respectively, with cervicodorsal sympathectomy, more often after open approach. Neuropathic complications (after cervicodorsal and lumbar sympathectomy) occurred in 11.9% of all patients. Compensatory hyperhidrosis occurred 3 time more often if the indication was palmar hyperhidrosis instead of neuropathic pain (52.3% versus 18.2%), whereas neuropathic complications occurred 3 times more often if the treatment was for neuropathic pain instead of palmar hyperhidrosis (25.2% versus 9.8%). Surgical sympathectomy, irrespective of approach, is accompanied by several potentially disabling complications. Detailed informed consent is recommended when surgical sympathectomy is contemplated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Furlan, A. D., Mailis, A., & Papagapiou, M. (2000). Are we paying a high price for surgical sympathectomy? A systematic literature review of late complications. Journal of Pain, 1(4), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1054/jpai.2000.19408

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free