Pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve: Why is this still happening?

37Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

During the past years, the industry and most transcatheter aortic valve operators have focused on reduction of paravalvular leaks rather than on the reduction of permanent pacemakers (PPM). However, since indication for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is moving toward a healthier and younger patient population, new PPMs may become more of an issue. Certain factors such as pre-existing conduction disorders or anatomical features cannot be changed. However, the amount of mechanical trauma to the conduction system and periprocedural medical management offers the potential for optimization. By optimizing our procedure, we may finally be able to achieve low, surgical-like, PPM rates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Toggweiler, S., & Kobza, R. (2018, November 1). Pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve: Why is this still happening? Journal of Thoracic Disease. AME Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.06.103

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free