Acceptance of Digital Health Technologies in Palliative Care Patients

9Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Digital health technologies have potential to transform palliative care (PC) services. The global aging population poses unique challenges for PC, which digital health technologies may help overcome. Evaluation of attitudes and perceptions combined with quantification of prior use habits favor an understanding of psychological barriers to PC patient acceptance of digital health technologies including artificial intelligence (AI). Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the attitudes and perceptions of PC patients regarding a broad range of digital health technologies used in their routine monitoring and treatment and identify barriers to use. Methods: We used a 39-item questionnaire to evaluate acceptance and use of smartphone-based electronic patient report outcome measures, wearables, AI, data privacy, and virtual reality (VR) in 29 female and male PC inpatients. Results: A majority of patients indicated an interest in (69.0%) and positive attitude toward (75.9%) digital health technologies. Nearly all (93.1%) patients believe that digital health technologies will become more important in medicine in the future. Most patients would consider using their smartphone (79.3%) or wearable (69.0%) more often for their health. The most feasible technologies were smartphones, wearables, and VR. Barriers to acceptance included unfamiliarity, data security, errors in data interpretation, and loss of personal interaction through AI. Conclusion: In this patient survey, acceptance of new technologies in a PC patient population was high, encouraging its use also at the end-of-life.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wicki, S., Clark, I. C., Amann, M., Christ, S. M., Schettle, M., Hertler, C., … Blum, D. (2024). Acceptance of Digital Health Technologies in Palliative Care Patients. Palliative Medicine Reports, 5(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2023.0062

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free