ChatBack: Investigating Strategies of Providing Synchronous Grammatical Error Feedback in a GUI-based Language Learning Social Chatbot

ISSN: 0736587X
18Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The increasing use of AI chatbots as conversation partners for second-language learners highlights the importance of providing effective feedback. To ensure a successful learning experience, it is essential for researchers and practitioners to understand the optimal timing, methods of delivery, and types of feedback that are most beneficial to learners. Synchronous grammar corrective feedback (CF) has been shown to be more effective than asynchronous methods in online writing tasks. Additionally, self-correction by language learners has proven more beneficial than teacher-provided correction, particularly for spoken language skills and non-novice learners. However, existing language-learning AI chatbots often lack synchronous CF and self-correction capabilities. To address this, we propose a synchronous conversational corrective feedback (CCF) method, which allows self-correction and provides metalinguistic explanations (ME). Our experiments examine the effects of different feedback presentation methods and self-correction on users’ learning experiences and intention to use the system.Our study suggests that in chatbot-driven language-learning tools, corrective feedback is more effectively delivered through means other than the social chatbot, such as a GUI interface. Furthermore, we found that guided self-correction offers a superior learning experience compared to providing explicit corrections, particularly for learners with high learning motivation or lower linguistic ability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liang, K. H., Davidson, S., Yuan, X., Panditharatne, S., Chen, C. Y., Shea, R., … Yu, Z. (2023). ChatBack: Investigating Strategies of Providing Synchronous Grammatical Error Feedback in a GUI-based Language Learning Social Chatbot. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 83–99). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free