Subjetividad, realidad y discurso entre el determinismo estructuralista y el construccionismo social

  • Cornejo R
  • Albornoz N
  • Palacios D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The study of the subjectivity and the subject appears today as a disputed field by different perspectives. In this article, we expose a framework to understand the subjectivity in a cultural historical approach and we propose theoretical, methodological and axiological issues for the study of subjectivity. We discuss the place of discourse in the study of social subjectivity through structuralism's positions and proposals of social constructionism. Finally, we defend that the Critical Discourse Analysis proposed by Norman Fairclough as a solid theoretical-methodological perspective for the study of the complex links between subjectivity, discourse and social reality. We propose that this approach, based on categories such as discursive practice, social practice hegemony, discursive order, intertextuality and discursive shift, can address the theoretical, methodological and axiological challenges regarding the study of subjectivity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cornejo, R., Albornoz, N., & Palacios, D. (2016). Subjetividad, realidad y discurso entre el determinismo estructuralista y el construccionismo social. Cinta de Moebio, (56), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-554x2016000200001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free