Attitudes and practices of New Zealand anaesthetists with regard to emergency drugs

15Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A postal survey of anaesthetists practising in New Zealand assessed practices with regard to the preparation of pre-drawn syringes of emergency drugs in theatre, and attitudes towards the drawing up of drugs by non-medically qualified assistants. Opinion and practice varied widely; a quarter of respondents routinely draw up such drugs and a third either never or very infrequently do so. The drugs most commonly drawn up in this way were suxamethonium, atropine, syntocinon, ephedrine and metaraminol. Providing anaesthesia single-handed, anaesthesia involving paediatric, obstetric or vascular cases, the use of major regional techniques and laryngeal mask anaesthesia were reported as factors which prompted a number of respondents to draw up one or more of these drugs. The majority (68.5%) had received no teaching on the issue and nearly all (83.5%) reported that there was no institutional policy in their workplace(s). "Syringe swap" or "wrong drug" errors related to such pre-drawn drugs were reported by 26.5%, while delay in drawing up a drug in an emergency was reported by 37%. Nearly all (98%) respondents believed that it was acceptable for an anaesthetic technician (or similar assistant) to draw up drugs in an emergency but only 14% approved of assistants drawing up drugs routinely. We conclude that there is no uniformity of opinion amongst New Zealand anaesthetists about which if any drugs should be pre-drawn for possible emergency use, and that few would endorse the drawing up of drugs by non-medically qualified assistants, except in emergency, or under other clearly delineated circumstances.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ducat, C. M., Merry, A. F., & Webster, C. S. (2000). Attitudes and practices of New Zealand anaesthetists with regard to emergency drugs. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 28(6), 692–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x0002800616

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free