Relationships between stress, demographics and dietary intake behaviours among low-income pregnant women with overweight or obesity

16Citations
Citations of this article
102Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective To identify demographic risk factors associated with high stress and examine the relationships between levels of stress, demographics and dietary fat, fruit and vegetable intakes in low-income pregnant women with overweight or obesity.Design A cross-sectional study.Setting Participants were recruited from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in Michigan, USA.Participants Participants (n 353) were non-Hispanic Black (black) or White (white).Results Women aged 35 years or older (OR=4·09; 95% CI 1·45, 11·51) and who had high school or less education (OR=1·88; 95% CI 1·22, 2·89) or were unemployed (OR=1·89; 95% CI 1·15, 3·12) were significantly more likely to report high stress than women who were younger, had at least some college education or were employed/homemakers. However, race and smoking status were not associated with level of stress. Women with high stress reported significantly lower fruit and vegetable intakes but not fat intake than women with low stress. Women aged 35 years or older reported significantly higher vegetable but not fat or fruit intake than women who were 18-24 years old. Black women reported significantly higher fat but not fruit or vegetable intake than white women. Education, employment and smoking status were not significantly associated with dietary intake of fat, fruits and vegetables.Conclusions Nutrition counselling on reducing fat and increasing fruit and vegetable intakes may consider targeting women who are black or younger or who report high stress, respectively.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chang, M. W., Tan, A., & Schaffir, J. (2019). Relationships between stress, demographics and dietary intake behaviours among low-income pregnant women with overweight or obesity. Public Health Nutrition, 22(6), 1066–1074. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980018003385

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free