Rethinking Field School Delivery and Addressing Our Biases

3Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Field schools are foundational training for archaeologists and the corresponding methods for instruction are largely consistent within the discipline. The expectation is that at some point early in their careers students will enroll in a field school. To participate, students must pay summer tuition, dedicate a minimum of four weeks (usually longer) to full-time fieldwork, and in many cases travel to remote locations. The reality is that for many students such expectations make field school participation an impossibility - and ultimately make archaeology a nonviable career option for students from historically underrepresented backgrounds. Offering local field opportunities within the context of a regular school year alleviates those problems. A recent field school in north Idaho demonstrated how traditional field school structure excludes many students and how archaeologists can adjust instruction to make field training more accessible to students.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Warner, M. S., Eichner, K. C. L., & Campbell, R. J. (2024). Rethinking Field School Delivery and Addressing Our Biases. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 12(4), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2024.20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free