Assessing the effectiveness of the UN Security Council's anti-terrorism measures: The quest for legitimacy and cohesion

132Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article aims to assess the effectiveness of the Security Council's anti-terror measures against the background of the Member States' practices of implementation. This survey is based primarily on the national reports submitted by states, pursuant to the relevant SC resolutions. Other issues, such as the legitimacy of the SC's actions and the encroachment of anti-terror measures on fundamental human rights, are also broached in so far as they may have an impact on the effectiveness of the implementation process. Finally, the article attempts to evaluate, primarily from the perspective of legal interpretation, how to reconcile the predominant security concerns underlying anti-terror measures with the cohesion of the international legal system. © 2006 Oxford University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bianchi, A. (2006). Assessing the effectiveness of the UN Security Council’s anti-terrorism measures: The quest for legitimacy and cohesion. European Journal of International Law, 17(5), 881–919. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chl032

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free