Infection Burden for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States

914Citations
Citations of this article
451Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We quantified the current and historical incidence of periprosthetic infection associated with hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, as well as corresponding hospitalization charges and length of stay. The rate of infected knee arthroplasties was 0.92%, significantly greater than that of infected hip arthroplasties with 0.88%. Length of stay was significantly longer for infected hip (9.7 days) and knee (7.6 days) arthroplasties compared to uninfected procedures (hip, 4.3 days; knee, 3.9 days) (P < .0001). Hospitalization charges were also significantly greater for infected joint arthroplasties than for uninfected arthroplasties (hips, 1.76 times; knees, 1.52 times) (P < .0001). Urban-non-teaching hospitals experienced the highest burden of infection with 1.18% for hips and 1.26% for knees compared to rural (0.61% for hips and 0.69% for knees) and urban-teaching hospitals (0.73% for hips and 0.77% for knees). We found an increasing number of joint arthroplasties being diagnosed with periprosthetic infection. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kurtz, S. M., Lau, E., Schmier, J., Ong, K. L., Zhao, K., & Parvizi, J. (2008). Infection Burden for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States. Journal of Arthroplasty, 23(7), 984–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free