Abstract
Background: Current perception is that participants of a structured weight-loss program regain all of their weight loss within 5 y. Objective: The objective was to examine the long-term weight-loss maintenance of individuals completing a structured weight-loss program. Design: Studies were required to 1) have been conducted in the United States, 2) have included participants in a structured weight-loss program, 3) have provided follow-up data with variance estimates for ≤ 2 y. Primary outcome variables were weight-loss maintenance in kilograms, weight-loss maintenance as a percentage of initial weight loss, and weight loss as a percentage of initial body weight (reduced weight). Results: Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Successful very-low-energy diets (VLEDs) were associated with significantly greater weight-loss maintenance than were successful hypoenergetic balanced diets (HBDs) at all years of follow-up. The percentage of individuals at 4 or 5 y of followup for VLEDs and HBDs were 55.4% and 79.7%, respectively. The results for VLEDs and HBDs, respectively, were as follows: weight-loss maintenance, 7.1 kg (95% CI: 6.1, 8,1 kg) and 2.0 (1.5, 2.5) kg; percentage weight-loss maintenance, 29% (25%, 33%) and 17% (13%, 22%); and reduced weight, 6.6% (5.7%, 7.5%) and 2.1% (1.6%, 2.7%). Weight-loss maintenance did not differ significantly between women and men. Six studies reported that groups who exercised more had significantly greater weight-loss maintenance than did those who exercised less. Conclusions: Five years after completing structured weight-loss programs, the average individual maintained a weight loss of < 3 kg and a reduced weight of < 3% of initial body weight. After VLEDs or weight loss of ≤ 20 kg, individuals maintained significantly more weight loss than after HBDs or weight losses of > 10 kg.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Anderson, J. W., Konz, E. C., Frederich, R. C., & Wood, C. L. (2001). Long-term weight-loss maintenance: A meta-analysis of US studies. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 74(5), 579–584. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/74.5.579
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.