Medical practice variation: Public reporting a first necessary step to spark change

41Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

From previous work, we know that medical practice varies widely, and that unwarranted variation signals low value for patients and society. We also know that public reporting helps to create awareness of the need for quality improvement. Despite the availability of rich data, most Western countries have no routine surveillance of the geographic distribution of utilization, costs, and outcomes of healthcare, including trends in variation over time. This paper highlights the role of transparent public reporting as a necessary first step to spark change and reduce unwarranted variation. Two recent examples of public reporting are presented to illustrate possible ways to reduce unwarranted variation and improve care. We conclude by introducing the Value Improvement Cycle, which underscores that reporting is only a necessary first step, and suggests a path toward developing a multi-stakeholder approach to change.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Westert, G. P., Groenewoud, S., Wennberg, J. E., Gerard, C., Dasilva, P., Atsma, F., & Goodman, D. C. (2018, November 1). Medical practice variation: Public reporting a first necessary step to spark change. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy092

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free