Implementing European case law at the bureaucratic frontline: How domestic signalling influences the outcomes of EU law

22Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

This article analyses the implementation of European case law at the bureaucratic frontline of European member states. Theoretically, insights from street-level implementation studies are combined with judicial impact research. Empirically, we compare how EU rules on free movement and cross-border welfare are applied in practice in Denmark, Austria and France. We find that when applying EU rules in practice, street-level bureaucrats are confronted with a world of legal complexity, consisting of ambiguous rules, underspecified concepts and a recent judicial turn by the Court of Justice of the European Union. In order to manage complexity, street-level bureaucrats turn to their more immediate superiors for guidance. As a consequence, domestic signals shape the practical application of EU law. Despite bureaucratic discretion and many country differences, domestic signals create uniform, restrictive outcomes of EU law in all three cases. Thus we show that there is considerable room for politics in EU implementation processes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martinsen, D. S., Blauberger, M., Heindlmaier, A., & Thierry, J. S. (2019). Implementing European case law at the bureaucratic frontline: How domestic signalling influences the outcomes of EU law. Public Administration, 97(4), 814–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12603

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free