Abstract
Background: Optimal right ventricular (RV) pacing site in patients referred for permanent cardiac pacing remains controversial. A prospective randomized trial was done to compare long-term effect of permanent RV apex (RVA) vs RV outflow tract (RVOT) pacing on the all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Methods and Results: A total of 122 consecutive patients (70 men, 69±11 years), with standard pacing indications were randomized to RVA (66 patients) or RVOT (56 patients) ventricular lead placement. After the 10-year follow-up period the mortality data were summarized on the basis of an intention-to-treat analysis. During the long-term follow-up, 31 patients from the RVA group died vs 24 patients in the RVOT group (hazard ratio (HR), 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.57-1.65; P=0.89). There were 10 cardiovascular deaths in the RVA and 12 in the RVOT group (HR, 1.04; 95%CI, 0.45-2.41; P=0.93). There were no differences in the all-cause or cardiovascular mortality between the pacing sites after adjustment for age, gender, arterial hypertension, atrial fibrillation, New York Heart Association class and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter. Conclusions: The RVOT provides no additional benefit in terms of long-term survival over RVA pacing.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Da̧browska-Kugacka, A., Lewicka-Nowak, E., Tybura, S., Wilczek, R., Staniewicz, J., Zagozdzon, P., … Świa̧tecka, G. (2009). Survival analysis in patients with preserved left ventricular function and standard indications for permanent cardiac pacing randomized to right ventricular apical or septal outflow tract pacing. Circulation Journal, 73(10), 1812–1819. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-09-0084
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.